Legal use of GPS tracking interrupter

In many cases, it is unreasonable for the Supreme Court to conduct GPS tracking without a warrant of arrest, noting that all movements that track that person's vehicle are not legal without a sufficient reason to obtain a warrant for that purpose . All local courts have still not complied with the Supreme Court's ruling, and I think this is a huge problem for the United States, because if the country's Supreme Court rules on something, is it a bit of a violation of its own laws.

For example, in a recent case in Iowa, an Amman Amaya was charged with drug trafficking. Iowa's gps jammer tracked a small number of his vehicles, while the other six were tracked. . This is a so-called "good faith" situation when a suspect is followed up by any U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based on binding precedent.

Similar GPS interference tracking cases were also submitted to the Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuit Courts, and they determined that unsafe GPS tracking was legal in the case, but they were tracked without their knowledge, which was a bit unreasonable. . These trips cover Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Indiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Alaska, North Dakota and South Dakota, California, Guam, and other states, Maria Islands, Montana, Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Nevada. If you are illegally followed by someone who is not authorized to perform this tracking task on your vehicle, there is a way to cope with this situation and stop GPS tracking without guaranteeing your car. Just buying a GPS jammer can perfectly solve this A dilemma.