China's Beidou satellite missile system is becoming more and more mature, and its military significance to China is becoming more and more obvious. In the era when GPS was king, the more advanced the weapon, the easier it was to be strangled by the US at a critical moment. Now that it has its own satellite-positioning system, America's trump card is silenced. But how could the United States, as it has always done, be willing to let China acquire such a powerful weapon so easily? The mini GPS satellite interceptor is an excellent device. According to recent media reports, the United States has decided to develop a satellite jammer code-named "Dongfeng King".As the name suggests, the GPS jammer is designed for China's Beidou positioning satellite System. Its main purpose is to create a Chinese strong Dongfeng series. Missiles are not effective in wartime.
The US wants to use its own jammer to disable the Beidou navigation system so that Dongfeng missiles can't hit in the war. Therefore, if the American idea can be realized, it will be of great significance to the Chinese rocket force. It's too bad. In fact, the United States began to explore anti-satellite weapons as early as the 1950s. At present, anti-satellite weapons can be divided into anti-satellite and anti-satellite missiles, which use their own satellites against enemy satellites. Strike at close range, or use anti-satellite missiles to strike enemy satellites at long range. Of course, no matter what kind of anti-satellite weapon is developed, it will be extremely disadvantageous for China, which has the Beidou navigation satellite System.
However, some netizens said that since the US military can develop a Dongfeng-busting satellite jammer, can't China develop a mini GPS satellite interceptor to counter it? In fact, the relationship between satellites and anti-satellite weapons is, to some extent, the relationship between spear and shield. Now that China's Beidou navigation satellite system is mature, how could China not develop anti-satellite weapons? So if the US has a "DF-buster" Beidou satellite jammer, then China must also have a mini GPS satellite interceptor. Some say "yes"; For example, many people who use mobile phones do not care about what is going on around them. Especially for drivers, distracted driving is too dangerous. Or information about "workplace conversations".
You don't get paid when you erase candy or play any other video game on your phone. The need for communication is also a beautifying way to support mobile phone use.GPS jammers should be legal in public libraries, schools, colleges, etc.(at least in the classroom). When the vehicle is running, the vehicle should be equipped with GPS jammers, gear, etc. Some say no. For example, even in the most uncomfortable places, people always need to communicate. Legalizing cell phone complaints will only enable private organizations to decide whether they want people to be able to use their phones when they visit the facility. This can lead to all kinds of problems. Schools in China and India use in-car GPS jammers to deter scammers. Mexico allowed riots in churches and hospitals.
Banks, a major customer, want to prevent potential burgers from contacting employees and plan to use the Mexican government in prisons. Pakistan was allowed to block banks and libraries. The Canadian side believes that such a situation could have been avoided under similar circumstances. However, Industry Canada, which oversees telecommunications activities in Canada, claims the device may violate personal liberty and undermine public safety by affecting security and law enforcement agencies. We decided against the move. Canada, Mexico, Germany, New Zealand, Norway, Turkey and dozens of other countries allow police and prisoners to use distractions.
