Blocking International Calls Cell Phone

Lichan Anke 2022/3/20

The shopkeeper then demonstrated, and saw that she screwed three black short rods into the antenna port one by one, and then pressed the switch, and a green indicator light on the top came on. The shopkeeper asked reporters to take out their mobile phones. The reporter saw that the mobile phone signal disappeared, and the reporter could not get through no matter how to dial. "Can't be too far from the machine, otherwise it will be useless." The owner reminded that the shielding range of this Blocking International Calls Cell Phone machine is no more than 10 meters. The principle of those big machines is the same, but the power is relatively large, and high-power mobile phone jammers can be used. Block the signal within one kilometer. The reporter noticed that there is no manufacturer and certificate of conformity on the packaging of cell phone jammer . "These are all secretly produced, how can there be a manufacturer?" The owner explained that her goods were imported from Guangdong, and the quality must be no problem. The reporter then investigated from other electronic stores such as Liaoning Road and Weihai Road and found that it is not difficult to buy mobile phone signal jammers, and the price ranges from a few hundred yuan to several thousand yuan.

At 8:00 a.m. on October 5, 2018, Blocking International Calls Cell Phone interference victim Mr. Yang stole the property left in Mr. Yang's Mercedes-Benz after locking the car. According to statistics, this part of the property totals more than 60 million yuan. On October 14, Zang was arrested by the police. Zang has pleaded not guilty to the prosecution's charges. Zang said he was jailed in 2009 for theft and was not released until 2014. After being released from prison, he guarded the door for others, but was later fired. Because there was no source of income, Zang felt very tight, so he returned to his old business and spent more than 2,000 yuan to buy a mobile phone jammer from the Internet to steal it. He did not expect that the theft methods of the year could still be used. In the end, the court found Zang guilty of theft and sentenced him to 10 months in prison and a fine of 10,000 yuan. Judge Bai Chongwei, who heard the case, said that it is not the first time I have seen a case of using a mobile phone jammer to commit a crime. There have been many similar cases in the past, all committed using electronic cell phone jammers. Although the case has been pronounced, the crisis of property theft in the car is still worthy of our vigilance. In Beijing, for example. In the past three months, there have been 7 cases of theft using mobile phone jammers, of which the largest single theft amounted to 40,000 yuan.